Biological functions are causes, not effects: A critique of selected effects theories

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 103 (C):20-28 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal.Marc Artiga - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-22.
Revisiting recent etiological theories of functions.Daniel M. Kraemer - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (5):747-759.
Function and Teleology.Justin Garson - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 525-549.
What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter.Justin Garson - 2019 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Adaptation and its Analogues: Biological Categories for Biosemantics.Hajo Greif - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90:298-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-20

Downloads
20 (#771,402)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas
Universidad de Navarra
Terrence W. Deacon
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Functional analysis.Robert E. Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
Functions.Larry Wright - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):139-168.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.

View all 21 references / Add more references