Digital Democracy: Episode IV—A New Hope*: How a Corporation for Public Software Could Transform Digital Engagement for Government and Civil Society

Digital Government: Research and Practice (DGOV) 1 (1):Article No. 6 (15 pages) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although successive generations of digital technology have become increasingly powerful in the past 20 years, digital democracy has yet to realize its potential for deliberative transformation. The undemocratic exploitation of massive social media systems continued this trend, but it only worsened an existing problem of modern democracies, which were already struggling to develop deliberative infrastructure independent of digital technologies. There have been many creative conceptions of civic tech, but implementation has lagged behind innovation. This article argues for implementing one such vision of digital democracy through the establishment of a public corporation. Modeled on the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in the United States, this entity would foster the creation of new digital technology by providing a stable source of funding to nonprofit technologists, interest groups, civic organizations, government, researchers, private companies, and the public. Funded entities would produce and maintain software infrastructure for public benefit. The concluding sections identify what circumstances might create and sustain such an entity.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Think About Deliberative Democracy.Tatyana Vasileva Petkova - 2017 - Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy 1 (1):15-26.
Local dialogue heard around the world.Susan Collins, Michael Kersey & Cindy Savage - 2007 - World Futures 63 (5 & 6):353 – 364.
Democracy, deliberation and disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence.Todd Davies & Reid Chandler - 2012 - In Tina Nabatchi, John Gastil, G. Michael Weiksner & Matt Leihninger (eds.), Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 103-131.
Digital Networks and the State.Saskia Sassen - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (4):19-33.
E-democracy, e-contestation and the monitorial citizen.Jeroen van den Hoven - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):51-59.
E-exclusion and the Gender Digital Divide.Georgia Foteinou - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (3):50-61.
Robust Deliberative Democracy.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (3-4):494-516.
Deliberating about the public interest.Ian O’Flynn - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):299-315.
Philosophy, politics, democracy: selected essays.Joshua Cohen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-21

Downloads
410 (#49,022)

6 months
88 (#54,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Davies
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.

Add more references