Interrogatives, inquiries, and exam questions

Erkenntnis:1-20 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The speech act of inquiry is generally treated as a default kind of asking questions. The widespread norm states that one inquires whether p only if one does not know that p. However, the fact that inquiring is just one kind of asking questions has received little to no attention. Just as in the declarative mood we can perform not only assertions, but various other speech acts, like guesses or predictions, so in the interrogative mood we can also make various speech act types. I propose a speech-act-theoretic account of a distinct kind of question that I label exam questions. According to the proposed account, one performs an exam question p only if (i) one has access to the answer to p, and (ii) one does not officially know whether the hearer knows the answer to p. Exam questions satisfy all the necessary requirements of being a distinct kind of speech act. Additionally, my proposal contributes to the recent expansion of the normative approach to a variety of speech acts.

Similar books and articles

How why-interrogatives work.Ryan Cox - 2019 - Synthese 198 (5):4651-4688.
Constructing an Ontology.Brian Ellis - 2006 - In Paolo Valore (ed.), Topics on General and Formal Ontology. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. pp. 15-26.
Welcoming speech.Gilbert Ryle - 1937 - Erkenntnis 7 (1):303-306.
Truth and speech acts.Robert Mößgen - 2007 - In Heather Dyke (ed.), Erkenntnis. Routledge. pp. 137-140.
Interpreting Supersymmetry.David John Baker - 2020 - Erkenntnis 87 (5):2375-2396.
Imperatives and logic.Jörgen Jörgensen - 1937 - Erkenntnis 7 (1):288-296.
Language, truth and logic.Olaf Helmer - 1937 - Erkenntnis 7 (1):123-125.
A reply to professor Wheatley.Henry S. Leonard - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (1):55-64.
Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
Religious ethics for AS and A2.Jill Oliphant - 2007 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Jon Mayled.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-16

Downloads
136 (#136,642)

6 months
136 (#27,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Grzegorz Gaszczyk
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

Lying with Uninformative Speech Acts.Grzegorz Gaszczyk - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (7):746-760.
The Informativeness Norm of Assertion.Grzegorz Gaszczyk - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.

View all 62 references / Add more references