A Deep Unity between Scientific Disciplines

Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):413-421 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.4236/ojpp.2013.33061

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The unity of science.Martin Carrier & Jürgen Mittelstrass - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):17-31.
Jedność nauki wczoraj i dziś.Witold Strawiński - 1996 - Filozofia Nauki 3.
Deep Ecology from the Perspective of Environmental Science.Frank B. Golley - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Scientific Practice and the Disunity of Physics.Andreas Hüttemann - 1998 - Philosophia Naturalis 35 (1):209-222.
Psychology and Psychologies: which Epistemology?Marco Fenici (ed.) - 2009 - Humana.Mente.
Les disciplines herméneutiques et la théorie critique sont-elles des formes de la rationalité scientifique?Stéphane Courtois - 1999 - Dialogue 38 (2):297-.
Reduction, integration, and the unity of science: Natural, behavioral, and social sciences and the humanities.William P. Bechtel & Andrew Hamilton - 2007 - In T. Kuipers (ed.), Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues (Volume 1 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science). Elsevier.
The Unity of Scientific Knowledge in the Framework of a Typological Approach of Theories.Ilie Parvu - 1996 - Theoria 11 (3):7-17.
Seeing the whole picture.Richard Norgaard & Paul Baer - 2003 - World Futures 59 (3 & 4):225 – 239.
Ecology: Scientific, Deep and Feminist.Markus J. Peterson & Tarla Rai Peterson‡ - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (2):123 - 146.
What can the systems community contribute to ensure the survival of civilization.Kenneth Watt - 2003 - World Futures 59 (3 & 4):241 – 251.
Jerzy Perzanowski: Modal Logics, Ontology and Ontologics.Raul Corazzon - unknown
Ahstract. Logical empiricists introduced and elahorated four ideas related to unity of science: unity of language, unity of laws, unity of method, and less typical for the mainstream of the movement Neurath's sociologically oriented idea of the unity of science practice. This paper presents the development of these ideas within the logical empiricist movement, and then outlines an answer to the question: how.Witold Strawiriski - 1995 - In HerfelWilliam (ed.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes. Rodopi. pp. 44--295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
62 (#261,426)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Malcolm R. Forster - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):478-480.
Wonderful Life; The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.Stephen Jay Gould - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):359-360.
Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.Stephen Jay Gould - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (1):163-165.

View all 12 references / Add more references