Anorexia Nervosa: A Case for Exceptionalism in Ethical Decision Making

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 26 (4):315-331 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The principles that usually direct ethical decision making are not easily or straightforwardly applicable to the care and treatment of anorexia nervosa, particularly the care and treatment of severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, where the sufferer seems to be recalcitrant to treatment and where the condition has become life-threatening.There are exceptional circumstances that characterize this puzzling and still scarcely understood condition; I suggest that these exceptional circumstances provide moral reasons for partial derogation from the usual principles of ethical decision making.In what follows I argue...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Decision making capacity should not be decisive in emergencies.Dieneke Hubbeling - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):229-238.
When the self is contested ground.Tommaso Bruni - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (4):4-6.
Anorexia nervosa.Vicki K. Condit - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (4):391-413.
The Crucible of Anorexia Nervosa.Barbara Russell - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (2):5.
The Crucible of Anorexia Nervosa.Barbara Russell - 2007 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2:1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-12

Downloads
73 (#226,958)

6 months
23 (#121,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references