Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade

Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):351-358 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that, in certain circumstances, doctors might beprofessionallyjustified to provide abortions even in those jurisdictions where abortion is illegal. That it is at least professionally permissible does not mean that they have an all-things-considered ethical justification or obligation to provide illegal abortions or that professional obligations or professional permissibility trump legal obligations. It rather means that professional organisations should respect and indeed protect doctors’ positive claims of conscience to provide abortions if they plausibly track what is in the best medical interests of their patients. It is the responsibility of state authorities to enforce the law, but it is the responsibility of professional organisations to uphold the highest standards of medical ethics, even when they conflict with the law. Whatever the legal sanctions in place, healthcare professionals should not be sanctioned by the professional bodies for providing abortions according to professional standards, even if illegally. Indeed, professional organisation should lobby to offer protection to such professionals. Our arguments have practical implications for what healthcare professionals and healthcare professional organisations may or should do in those jurisdictions that legally prohibit abortion, such as some US States after the reversal ofRoe v Wade.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Roe v. Wade and the Predatory State Interest in Protecting Future Cannon Fodder.Matti Häyry - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):434-442.
Am I My Profession's Keeper?Avery Kolers - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (1):1-7.
Conscientious Refusal and Access to Abortion and Contraception.Chloe Fitzgerald & Carolyn McLeod - 2015 - In John Arras, Elizabeth Fenton & Rebecca Kukla (eds.), Routledge Companion to Bioethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 343-356.
The Wrong Argument for a Bad Law.Eric Mathison - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):77-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-11

Downloads
1 (#1,904,130)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?