Unmixed Forms and Ordered Sensibles

Ancient Philosophy 44 (1):83-97 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I re-examine the starting point of the Philebus’ description of the ‘divine method’ and argue that the vexed phrase τῶν ἀεὶ λεγομένων εἶναι at 16c9 refers to sensibles only. In doing so, I especially stress the significance of the phrase τούτων οὕτω διακεκοσμημένων at 16d1. The proposed interpretation fits the rest of the description of the ‘divine method’, preserves the Forms’ unmixed nature and the consistency of the Philebus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mixed vs. unmixed lists in transfer studies.Helen M. Twedt & Benton J. Underwood - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):111.
Aristotle on Knowledge of Nature.Edward Halper - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (4):811 - 835.
On Ordered Pluralism.Matthieu Queloz - 2019 - Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (3):305-11.
Scotus on Accidental and Essential Causes.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 2008 - Franciscan Studies 66:233 - 246.
Partially ordered connectives.Gabriel Sandu & Jouko Väänänen - 1992 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 38 (1):361-372.
Soft ordered semigroups.Young Bae Jun, Kyoung Ja Lee & Asghar Khan - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):42-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-10

Downloads
19 (#803,690)

6 months
19 (#138,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references