Menschenwürde, Selbstbestimmung und Pluralismus: Zwischen sittlicher Vorgabe und deontologischer Konstruktion

Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 103 (3):322-336 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of human dignity fulfils different normative functions, making demands on heterogeneous resources for justification. After a short summary of Kant’s concept of dignity and its meta-ethica/ content which defines “Kantianism”, we will deal with three problematic aspects of the Kantian concept of dignity and provide a sketch of its reception in the German Constitution. Then we will present an ascriptivistic concept as an alternative to the Kantian one and discuss its limitations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selbstbestimmung zwischen Perfektionismus und Voluntarismus.Thomas Schramme - 2011 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (6):881-896.
Menschenwürde zwischen Recht, Prinzip und Referenz.Susanne Baer - 2005 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 53 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-22

Downloads
35 (#459,020)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Quante
University of Münster
Thomas Gutmann
University of Münster

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references