Ant: a process aware annotation software for regulatory compliance

Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-36 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Accurate data annotation is essential to successfully implementing machine learning (ML) for regulatory compliance. Annotations allow organizations to train supervised ML algorithms and to adapt and audit the software they buy. The lack of annotation tools focused on regulatory data is slowing the adoption of established ML methodologies and process models, such as CRISP-DM, in various legal domains, including in regulatory compliance. This article introduces Ant, an open-source annotation software for regulatory compliance. Ant is designed to adapt to complex organizational processes and enable compliance experts to be in control of ML projects. By drawing on Business Process Modeling (BPM), we show that Ant can contribute to lift major technical bottlenecks to effectively implement regulatory compliance through software, such as the access to multiple sources of heterogeneous data and the integration of process complexities in the ML pipeline. We provide empirical data to validate the performance of Ant, illustrate its potential to speed up the adoption of ML in regulatory compliance, and highlight its limitations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):315-320.
Index of Key Words.[author unknown] - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):347-347.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):447-452.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):303-308.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1):219-224.
Editors' introduction.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):157-161.
Catala: Moving towards the future of legal expert systems.Liane Huttner & Denis Merigoux - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-24.
Transition systems for designing and reasoning about norms.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (4):345-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-18

Downloads
19 (#803,294)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?