Where should we draw the line between quality of care and other ethical concerns related to medical registries and biobanks?

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):313-323 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Together with large biobanks of human samples, medical registries with aggregated data from many clinical centers are vital parts of an infrastructure for maintaining high standards of quality with regard to medical diagnosis and treatment. The rapid development in personalized medicine and pharmaco-genomics only underscores the future need for these infrastructures. However, registries and biobanks have been criticized as constituting great risks to individual privacy. In this article, I suggest that quality with regard to diagnosis and treatment is an inherent, morally normative requirement of health care, and argue that quality concerns in this sense may be balanced with privacy concerns

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining quality of care persuasively.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):243-261.
Between Beneficence and Justice: The Ethics of Stewardship in Medicine.L. A. Jansen - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):50-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
41 (#385,098)

6 months
2 (#1,194,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mats J. Hansson
Uppsala Universitet

Citations of this work

Demystifying Biobanks.Bartha M. Knoppers, Edward S. Dove & Ma'N. H. Zawati - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (5):4-5.

Add more citations