Data over dialogue: Why artificial intelligence is unlikely to humanise medicine

Dissertation, Monash University (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, a growing number of experts in artificial intelligence (AI) and medicine have be-gun to suggest that the use of AI systems, particularly machine learning (ML) systems, is likely to humanise the practice of medicine by substantially improving the quality of clinician-patient relationships. In this thesis, however, I argue that medical ML systems are more likely to negatively impact these relationships than to improve them. In particular, I argue that the use of medical ML systems is likely to comprise the quality of trust, care, empathy, understanding, and communication between clinicians and patients.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Machines?Ariela Tubert - 2018 - Seattle University Law Review 41 (4).
Three Problems with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Benjamin Chin-Yee & Ross Upshur - 2019 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62 (2):237-256.
Ethical Problems of Digitization and Robotization in Medicine.Elena V. Vvedenskaya - 2020 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63 (2):104-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-27

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Hatherley
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references