Reflexivity, expectations feedback and almost self-fulfilling equilibria: economic theory, empirical evidence and laboratory experiments

Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):406-419 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss recent work on bounded rationality and learning in relation to Soros' principle of reflexivity and stress the empirical importance of non-rational, almost self-fulfilling equilibria in positive feedback systems. As an empirical example, we discuss a behavioral asset pricing model with heterogeneous expectations. Bubble and crash dynamics is triggered by shocks to fundamentals and amplified by agents switching endogenously between a mean-reverting fundamental rule and a trend-following rule, based upon their relative performance. We also discuss learning-to-forecast laboratory experiments, showing that in positive feedback systems individuals coordinate expectations on non-rational, almost self-fulfilling equilibria with persistent price fluctuations very different from rational equilibria. Economic policy analysis may benefit enormously by focusing on efficiency and welfare gains in correcting mispricing along almost self-fulfilling equilibria

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-14

Downloads
33 (#487,172)

6 months
16 (#160,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflexivity, complexity, and the nature of social science.Eric D. Beinhocker - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):330-342.
A reply to Rosser and Kirman.Cars Hommes - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (3):317-321.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Irrational Exuberance.Robert J. Shiller - 2001 - Princeton University Press.
Fallibility, Reflexivity, and the Human Uncertainty Principle.George Soros - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):309-329.

Add more references