Is semantic correctness descriptive?

Theoria 88 (5):899-907 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the normativists, dispositionalist theories of meaning fail because meaning is normative, not descriptive. One way to understand this notion of normativity is in terms of semantic correctness conditions. Anti-normativists typically accept that meaning implies semantic correctness but deny that this in turn implies that meaning is normative. Jeffrey Kaplan has recently argued that while semantic correctness may not imply full-blown normativity, semantic correctness is not descriptive either. I contend that Kaplan's argument has two main problems. First, his focus on dispositionalism leaves it open for other descriptive facts to provide the basis of semantic correctness conditions. Second, he fails to show that the problems of dispositionalism are connected to semantic correctness in a way that demonstrates problems with descriptive theories of meaning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Engel on doxastic correctness.Conor McHugh - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1451-1462.
Paulo Freire and political correctness.Peter Roberts - 1997 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 29 (2):83–101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-02

Downloads
43 (#371,715)

6 months
18 (#143,743)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aleksi Honkasalo
Tampere University

References found in this work

Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
Is meaning normative?Anandi Hattiangadi - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
Is Meaning Fraught with Ought?Daniel Whiting - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):535-555.

Add more references