The influence of direct and indirect semantic contexts on binocular-rivalry resolution

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (3):213-214 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337606

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. [REVIEW]Frank Tong - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
A Primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies.R. R. Blake - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Binocular rivalry and visual awareness.Timothy J. Andrews - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10):407-409.
The influence of figure-ground relationships in binocular rivalry.Lawrence T. Alexander - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):376.
Binocular rivalry between complex stimuli in split-brain observers.Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.
Frank sengpiel, tobe cb Freeman, Tobias bonhoef-fer and Colin blakemore/on the relationship between interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex and binocular rivalry 39–54 Frank tong/competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible. [REVIEW]Perceptual Rivalry Alternations, Robert P. O’Shea & Paul M. Corballis - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2:361-363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
18 (#839,032)

6 months
11 (#248,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Effects of semantic cues in dichoptic presentation.Sandra Lema-Stern & Richard L. Gottwald - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (4):215-218.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nature of the effect of set on perception.Ralph N. Haber - 1966 - Psychological Review 73 (4):335-351.

Add more references