Mental Prosthesis Strikes Back

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):247-249 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McCarthy and Howard (2023) develop an ethical case for supported decision-making in medical contexts, mainly building upon the republican ideal of non-domination. Their theoretical inquiry is of mu...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supported Decision-Making: Non-Domination Rather than Mental Prosthesis.Allison M. McCarthy & Dana Howard - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):227-237.
Strikes.Roberta Ann Springer Loewy & R. S. Loewy - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics.
Physicians' strikes--a rejoinder.S. M. Glick - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):196-197.
Foundationalism Strikes Back? In Search of Epistemically Basic Mental States.Bence Nanay - 2005 - In Rene van Woudenberg, Sabine Roeser & Ron Rood (eds.), Basic Belief and Basic Knowledge. Ontos-Verlag. pp. 4--41.
The French strikes of 1995: Back to the future?Dick Howard - 1996 - Constellations 3 (2):248-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-10

Downloads
16 (#910,507)

6 months
9 (#315,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shu Ishida
Hiroshima University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations