Power types in explicit mathematics?

Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1142-1146 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note it is shown that in explicit mathematics the strong power type axiom is inconsistent with (uniform) elementary comprehension and discuss some general aspects of power types in explicit mathematics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is special about “implicit” and “explicit”?Geir Overskeid - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):780-780.
On power set in explicit mathematics.Thomas Glass - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):468-489.
Relating Quine's NF to Feferman's EM.Andrea Cantini - 1999 - Studia Logica 62 (2):141-162.
Explicit mathematics with the monotone fixed point principle.Michael Rathjen - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):509-542.
Realization of analysis into explicit mathematics.Sergei Tupailo - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1848-1864.
The NCTM Standards and the Philosophy of Mathematics.Charalampos Toumasis - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (3):317-330.
Uniform inseparability in explicit mathematics.Andrea Cantini & Pierluigi Minari - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):313-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#660,486)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The universal set and diagonalization in Frege structures.Reinhard Kahle - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):205-218.
Explicit mathematics: power types and overloading.Thomas Studer - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 134 (2-3):284-302.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references