Aristotle on the Unity of Touch

Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (1):23-43 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle is history’s most famous and influential proponent of the view that there are exactly five senses. But was he entitled to hold this view, given his other commitments? In particular, was he entitled to treat touch as a single sense, given the diversity of its correlated objects? In this paper I argue that Aristotle wished to individuate touch on the basis of its correlated objects, just as he had the other four senses. I also argue, contrary to what is often supposed, that he was well-placed to do so, given his other commitments and views.

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch.Michael Golluber - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.
Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch.Michael Golluber - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Touch and Flesh in Aristotle’s de Anima.Rebecca Steiner Goldner - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Book Review: The First Sense. [REVIEW]Tony Cheng - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:1196.
Aristotle on Substance and Unity.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:79-91.
Aristotle on Substance and Unity.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:79-91.
The place of unity in Aristotle's metaphysical project.D. Morrison - 1993 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 9:131-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-16

Downloads
392 (#51,678)

6 months
268 (#8,715)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Johnstone
McMaster University

Citations of this work

Touch and Bodily Transparency.Vivian Mizrahi - 2023 - Mind 132 (527):803-827.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Some remarks about the senses.H. P. Grice - 1962 - In R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, First Series. Oxford University Press.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern.Victor Caston - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (3):309-363.

View all 12 references / Add more references