Patients accept therapy using embryonic stem cells for Parkinson’s disease: a discrete choice experiment

BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-13 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundNew disease-modifying ways to treat Parkinson’s disease (PD) may soon become a reality with intracerebral transplantation of cell products produced from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The aim of this study was to assess what factors influence preferences of patients with PD regarding stem-cell based therapies to treat PD in the future.MethodsPatients with PD were invited to complete a web-based discrete choice experiment to assess the importance of the following attributes: (i) type of treatment, (ii) aim of treatment, (iii) available knowledge of the different types of treatments, (iv) effect on symptoms, and (v) risk for severe side effects. Latent class conditional logistic regression models were used to determine preference estimates and heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences.ResultsA substantial difference in respondents’ preferences was observed in three latent preference patterns (classes). “Effect on symptoms” was the most important attribute in class 1, closely followed by “type of treatment,” with medications as preferred to other treatment alternatives. Effect on symptoms was also the most important attribute in class 2, with treatment with hESCs preferred over other treatment alternatives. Likewise for class 3, that mainly focused on “type of treatment” in the decision-making. Respondents’ class membership was influenced by their experience in treatment, side effects, and advanced treatment therapy as well as religious beliefs.ConclusionsMost of the respondents would accept a treatment with products emanating from hESCs, regardless of views on the moral status of embryos. Preferences of patients with PD may provide guidance in clinical decision-making regarding treatments deriving from stem cells.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stem Cells.C. N. Svendsen - 2004 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 5–17.
Direct Reprogramming and Ethics in Stem Cell Research.W. Malcolm Byrnes - 2008 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 8 (2):277-290.
The Ethical Use of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Research and Therapy.John Harris - 2004 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 158–174.
Stem Cell Research: Science, Ethics and the Popular Media.Karori Mbũgua - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (1):5-10.
Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-14

Downloads
18 (#835,016)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations