Defending Wokeness: A Response to Davidson

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6):21-26 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lacey J. Davidson (2023) raises several insightful objections to the group partiality account of wokeness. The paper aims to move the discussion forward by either responding to or developing Davidson’s objections. My goal is not to show that the partiality account is foolproof but to think about the direction of future discussion—future critique, modification, and response. Davidson thinks that the partiality account of wokeness does not sufficiently define wokeness, as the paper sets out to do. Davidson also alleges that the account appropriates the term from minority communities.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining Wokeness.J. Spencer Atkins - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):321-338.
A Quandary of Wokeness.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2022 - Journal of Controversial Ideas 2 (1).
Quine and Davidson: Two naturalized epistemologists.Roger F. Gibson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):449 – 463.
Language Learning in Wittgenstein and Davidson.Ben Kotzee - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):413-431.
Pointing out the Skeptic's Mistake.Ryan Simonelli - 2014 - Florida Philosophical Review 14 (1):69-84.
A Critical Analysis of Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Action.John Michael Mcguire - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Davidson's no-priority thesis in defending the Turing Test.Mohammad Reza Vaez Shahrestani - 2012 - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32:456-461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-27

Downloads
171 (#114,136)

6 months
103 (#43,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Spencer Atkins
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the epistemic costs of implicit bias.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (1):33-63.
Epistemic partiality in friendship.Sarah Stroud - 2006 - Ethics 116 (3):498-524.
On Epistemic Appropriation.Emmalon Davis - 2018 - Ethics 128 (4):702-727.
Defining Wokeness.J. Spencer Atkins - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):321-338.

View all 7 references / Add more references