A Kantian responds to Santayana

SOCRATES 3 (1):66-79 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I have argued that whatever might be said about his attack on other German philosophers, Santayana’s attack on Kant, despite its subtlety, its force and its intelligence, is fundamentally misguided. Teasing out where Santayana’s attack rests on misunderstandings of Kant’s philosophy is a useful exercise: it is useful for Kantians, for it gives us a chance to show Kant at his best; it is useful for Santayana scholars, for it reminds us that Santayana, for all his brilliance, was not infallible; and it is useful more generally, for the mistakes Santayana makes about Kant are, perhaps in part because of Santayana’s well-deservedly wide influence, still prevalent today.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Santayana and His "Hero".Daniel Spiro - 2014 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 22 (2):213-230.
Santayana and Schopenhauer.Matthew Caleb Flamm - 2002 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (3):413 - 431.
Angus Kerr-Lawson, abulensean pragmatism, and the problem of values.Krzysztof Skowronski - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (4):pp. 532-542.
The essential wisdom of George Santayana.Thomas N. Munson - 1962 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-05

Downloads
687 (#24,552)

6 months
118 (#34,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references