Animal thought exceeds language-of-thought

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e279 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Quilty-Dunn et al. claim that all complex infant and animal reasoning implicate language-of-thought hypothesis (LOTH)-like structures. We agree with the authors that the mental life of animals can be explained in representationalist terms, but we disagree with their idea that the complexity of mental representations is best explained by appealing to abstract concepts, and instead, we explain that it doesn't need to.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The languages of thought.Lawrence J. Kaye - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):92-110.
More thought on thought and talk.John Bishop - 1980 - Mind 89 (January):1-16.
Thought, language, and animals.Hans-Johann Glock - 1986 - In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press. pp. 139-160.
Thought and Language.Michael Pendlebury - 2002 - South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):200-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-29

Downloads
29 (#553,855)

6 months
18 (#144,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Albert Newen
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Angelica Kaufmann
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking with maps.Elisabeth Camp - 2007 - Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):145–182.
How to ascribe beliefs to animals.Albert Newen & Tobias Starzak - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (1):3-21.
Analogue Magnitude Representations: A Philosophical Introduction.Jacob Beck - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):829-855.

Add more references