Teilhard de Chardin, the “Six Propositions,” and the Holy Office

Zygon 54 (4):932-953 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Between 1924 and 1937, the Jesuit Curia in Rome repeatedly placed restrictions on what Jesuit priest‐paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was allowed to write on those aspects of human origins that, in the view of the Curia, had theological as well as scientific aspects. In 2018, David Grumett and Paul Bentley published an account of the first of those restrictions, together with a previously undiscovered document associated with that restriction. This article corrects a relatively important error in their historical narrative, offers an alternative to their comments about the case, and concludes by embedding the events of 1924–1925 in a slightly larger history of Teilhard's relations with the Jesuit Curia and with the Holy Office. That larger narrative shows that, while Grumett and Bentley's account was mistaken about the involvement of the Holy Office in the case they discuss, it was not wrong about the concerns of that Congregation in questions of human origins.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The continuous flame.Harry J. Cargas - 1969 - St. Louis, Mo.,: B. Herder.
Teilhard de Chardin on love and suffering.Paul Chauchard - 1966 - Glen Rock, N.J.,: Paulist Press.
Teilhard de Chardin en Chine: correspondance inédite, 1923-1940.Pierre Teilhard de Chardin - 2004 - Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Edited by Amélie Vialet & Arnaud Hurel.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-14

Downloads
37 (#433,006)

6 months
11 (#242,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.Kenneth W. Kemp - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):217-236.
Defending Adam After Darwin.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):337-352.
Defending Adam After Darwin.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):337-352.

Add more references