Strong affirmative action programs and disproportionate burdens

Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (2):201-209 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Affirmative action programs are not justified by compensatory justice. They place a disproportionate burden on white-male applicants. White-male applicants do not owe compensation because they committed a relevant wrongdoing or because they benefitted from another’s wrongdoing. They did not commit a relevant wrongdoing. Receipt of an unjust benefit, when unavoidable and mixed with hard work, does not justify a duty to compensate a victim of the injustice. Thus, the compensatory-justice argument for affirmative action fails.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#201,679)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

Citations of this work

Affirmative action.Robert Fullinwider - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justifying reverse discrimination in employment.George Sher - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (2):159-170.
Justice and the Concept of Desert.James P. Sterba - 1976 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (2):188.

Add more references