How the relationship between the concept of "Being" and the meaning of "God" in Boethius' theological treatises

Journal of Philosophical Investigations 16 (39):437-452 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central issue in this article is to understand how is the relationship between the concept of "Being" and the meaning of "God" in Boethius' theological treatises. To this end, four issues are analyzed analytically-descriptively in Theological Treatises; 1. Why did Boethius raise the issue of ontology in Theological Treatises, and what was his purpose in distinguishing between "esse" and "id quod est" in these treatises with a purely Christian and theological nature? 2. The effect of this discussion in explaining God' transcendence through the three attributes "necessity", "perfection" and "to being goodness" of being; 3. The effect of this discussion on God's "creation"; 4. Its effect on God' unity. The study of these cases led to the conclusion that Boethius, by distinguishing between "esse" and "id quod est", considers God to be a simple being in whom "esse" and "id quod est" are one, so being is necessary for Him. God' perfection is also due to His simplicity essence; because He is His own essence and substance, so any quantity and quality that is applied to God will be the carrying of substance. Boethius explains God' simplicity in terms of the originality of being and action, and equates God' being with the Goodness itself, but creatures that are not simple are something else in addition to being good. The Creator and the creature are substantial different, and His Ubiquity goes back to God' substance beyond the two categories of place and time. By distinguishing the abstract number from the concrete number, Boethius believes that the Trinity does not produces plurality, because there is no difference of merit in God and He is nothing but His own essence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Теорія пізнання северина боеція: Головні концепції та сенси в контексті середньовічної теології.Maksym R. Kulyk - 2020 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 63:109-118.
Boethius's de Topicis Differentiis.Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius - 1978 - Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press. Edited by Eleonore Stump.
Boethius und die Tradition.Erwin Sonderegger - 1994 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 48 (4):558–571.
Beauty, Ethics and Numbers in Boethius’ Quadrivial Treatises.Cecilia Panti - 2018 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 11 (1):67-79.
Boethius and the Theological Origins of the Concept of Person.Joseph W. Koterski - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):203-224.
Ser y trascendentalidad. Un estudio en Tomás de Aquino.Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón - 1984 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 19:11.
Sentido de la ontología fundamental en Heidegger.Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón - 1966 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 1 (5):29-52.
Logic in Apuleius and Boethius.Manuel Correia - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1035-1052.
Boethius.John Marenbon - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Schutz on Pure We-Relationship.Chung-Chi Yu - 2002 - NTU Philosophical Review 25:261-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-20

Downloads
9 (#1,258,077)

6 months
7 (#438,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references