- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Sham Surgery Debate and the Moral Complexity of Risk-Benefit Analysis
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):68-70 (2003)
Abstract
No abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
The ethics of sham surgery in Parkinson's disease: Back to the future?Teresa Swift & Richard Huxtable - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (4):175-185.
Sham surgery controls: intracerebral grafting of fetal tissue for Parkinson's disease and proposed criteria for use of sham surgery controls.R. L. Albin - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):322-325.
A Response to Commentators on "Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis".Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):36-36.
Science, democracy, and public policy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2):255-264.
Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:217 - 232.
Challenging research on human subjects: justice and uncompensated harms.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):29-51.
Making Risk-Benefit Assessments of Medical Research Protocols.Alex Rajczi - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):338-348.
Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.
Sham surgery controls are mitigated trolleys.R. L. Albin - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):149-152.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
41 (#391,763)
6 months
7 (#441,920)
2010-09-14
Downloads
41 (#391,763)
6 months
7 (#441,920)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The real problem with equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Does Placebo Surgery-Controlled Research Call for New Provisions to Protect Human Research Participants?Dorothy E. Vawter, Karen G. Gervais & Thomas B. Freeman - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):50-53.
Response to Commentators on “Rethinking Research Ethics”.Rosamond Rhodes - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W15-W18.
A Response to Commentators on "Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis".Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):36-36.
References found in this work
Sham surgery: An ethical analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):157-166.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):41-48.
Thinking Clearly about Research Risk: Implications of the Work of Benjamin Freedman.Charles Weijer - 1999 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 21 (6):1.
Placebo Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?Peter A. Clark - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):58-68.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo