A Counterexample to the Uniqueness Thesis

Philosophia 43 (2):403-409 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I present a straightforward counterexample to the Uniqueness Thesis, which holds, roughly speaking, that there is a unique rational response to any particular body of evidence

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Case for Rational Uniqueness.Jonathan Matheson - 2011 - Logic and Episteme 2 (3):359-373.
Justification and the Uniqueness Thesis.Luis Rosa - 2012 - Logos and Episteme (4):571-577.
Conciliationism and Uniqueness.Nathan Ballantyne & E. J. Coffman - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):657-670.
Non-uniqueness as a non-problem.Mark Balaguer - 1998 - Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):63-84.
Epistemic permissiveness.Roger White - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):445–459.
Epistemic instrumentalism.Matthew Lockard - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1701-1718.
Uniqueness in context.Nancy R. Howell - 2008 - Zygon 43 (2):493-503.
The Uniqueness of the World.Luis J. Boya - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (3):385-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-16

Downloads
259 (#78,990)

6 months
19 (#137,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Kopec
Harvard University

References found in this work

Peer disagreement and higher order evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
Epistemological puzzles about disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236.
Epistemic permissiveness.Roger White - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):445–459.

View all 14 references / Add more references