Logical reduction of relations: From relational databases to Peirce’s reduction thesis

Logic Journal of the IGPL (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study logical reduction (factorization) of relations into relations of lower arity by Boolean or relative products that come from applying conjunctions and existential quantifiers to predicates, i.e. by primitive positive formulas of predicate calculus. Our algebraic framework unifies natural joins and data dependencies of database theory and relational algebra of clone theory with the bond algebra of C.S. Peirce. We also offer new constructions of reductions, systematically study irreducible relations and reductions to them and introduce a new characteristic of relations, ternarity, that measures their ‘complexity of relating’ and allows to refine reduction results. In particular, we refine Peirce’s controversial reduction thesis, and show that reducibility behaviour is dramatically different on finite and infinite domains.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Peirce’s Reduction Thesis Gerrymandered?Sergiy Koshkin - 2023 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 58 (4):271-300.
Reduction and genetics.David L. Hull - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):125-144.
Is functional reduction logical reduction?Max Kistler - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (14):219-234.
Does functional reduction need bridge laws? A response to Marras.Kevin Morris - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):647-657.
Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras.Kevin Morris - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):647-657.
Spatial ontology and physical modalities.Hugh M. Lacey & Elizabeth Anderson - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (3):261 - 285.
Reduction in genetics.David L. Hull - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):316-320.
Why It Is Time To Move Beyond Nagelian Reduction.Marie I. Kaiser - 2012 - In D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, M. Stöltzner & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective. Heidelberg, GER: Springer. pp. 255-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-11

Downloads
19 (#802,800)

6 months
12 (#219,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergiy Koshkin
University of Houston - Downtown

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references