Why Diachronic Constitution Won’t Help. Commentary on “Dissolving the Causal-Constitution Fallacy”

In Mark-Oliver Casper & Giuseppe Flavio Artese (eds.), Situated Cognition Research: Methodological Foundations. Springer Verlag. pp. 175-180 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short commentary, I will first show why Kiverstein & Kirchhoff's (this volume) analysis of the CC-fallacy is inadequate in an important way and show why their strategy for avoiding the CC-fallacy based on diachronic constitution is problematic. Second, I will reply to their criticism of the mechanistic account of constitution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Coupling‐Constitution Fallacy.Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa - 2008 - In Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa (eds.), The Bounds of Cognition. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 88–105.
Loops, Constitution and Cognitive Extension.S. Orestis Palermos - 2014 - Cognitive Systems Research 27:25-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-28

Downloads
8 (#1,322,157)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beate Krickel
Technische Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references