The Man of Science as an Intellectual: The Public Mission of Scientist

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 23:61-69 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_Purpose._ The paper is aimed at identifying the ways of scientist’s influence on the development of modern society as compared to those of intellectuals. _Theoretical basis._ The socio-anthropological approach to the role of scientists in post-industrial society shows the leading role of people of science as a social group in present-day society. However, philosophical axiology reveals that scientists in today’s society do not have the appropriate social status: neither in state governance nor in the sphere of forming public opinion. The classical doctrine concerning intellectuals has suffered a crisis in recent decades, which is due to the growing gap between the group of intellectuals recognized by society and the sphere of science. A new theoretical approach to determining the role of present-day research scientists as intellectuals is necessary. _Originality._ Successful development of modern society in conditions of growing social turbulence necessitates the access of research scientists to the sphere of public communication. This is required both by the needs of science advancement itself – to receive its adequate funding and win wide public recognition, and by society’s needs – as it is scientists who can provide reliable diagnostics of social problems and formulate well-grounded programs for overcoming them. _Conclusions._ For overcoming social barriers and getting access to public space, scientists themselves have to recognize themselves as a destitute social group – those who are unfairly deprived of making principal decisions in today’s society. For that, scientists should become modern intellectuals. Unlike media intellectuals, scientists are to interact not with social masses but, first and foremost, with public elites. The scientist has to gain his/her independent status by achieving the recognition of his/her own ideas among social elites rather than by winning wide personal popularity. Hence, scientists must aim at obtaining the status of the elite for elites – this would reveal in scientists the deepest potential of a modern man.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Birth of Public Sphere from the Spirit of Intellectual Debates.Liana A. Tukhvatulina - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):54-59.
The Impossibility of the Public.Hsin-I. Liu - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
The Impossibility of the Public.Hsin-I. Liu - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Religion, rights and the public sphere.Volker Kaul - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (4-5):376-382.
The Role of the Mass Media As Stakeholders In Conferring Corporate Legitimacy.Irène Perrin - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:467-469.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-11

Downloads
14 (#995,076)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Freedom as a Key Value of the Volunteer Movement.O. Y. Iliuk - 2023 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 24:27-36.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements.Kristina Rolin - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:11-19.
Communicative Approach to Determining the Role of Personality in Science.O. N. Kubalskyi - 2022 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 22:36-48.

Add more references