The Epistemic Status of Auxiliary Hypotheses: A Reply to Douven

Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):376-380 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empirical equivalence and underdetermination.Husain Sarkar - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):187 – 197.
The bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses: Reply to Fitelson and Waterman.Michael Strevens - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):913-918.
The assessment of auxiliary hypotheses.Jarrett Leplin - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):235-249.
Contextual falsification and scientific methodology.Jarrett Leplin - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):476-490.
The bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses.Michael Strevens - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):515-537.
A reply to Igor Douven.Marc Slors - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):150-152.
Bayesian confirmation and auxiliary hypotheses revisited: A reply to Strevens.Branden Fitelson & Andrew Waterman - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):293-302.
Hypotheses? Forget about it!Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Philosophy Now (Jul/Aug):47.
Ad hoc auxiliary hypotheses and falsificationism.Adolf Grünbaum - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):329-362.
Auxiliary Hypotheses in Evidence and Evolution. [REVIEW]Roger Sansom - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):673-682.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
12 (#1,089,546)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jarrett Leplin
University of North Carolina, Greensboro

Citations of this work

Empirical equivalence, explanatory force, and the inference to the best theory.Igor Douven - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):281-309.
A Davidsonian argument against incommensurability.Igor Douven & Henk W. De Regt - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):157 – 169.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references