Ethics, evolution and the a priori: Ross on Spencer and the French Sociologists

In Michael Ruse & Robert J. Richards (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter I critically discuss the dismissal of the philosophical significance of facts about human evolution and historical development in the work of W. D Ross. I address Ross’s views about the philosophical significance of the emerging human sciences of his time in two of his main works, namely The Right and the Good and The Foundations of Ethics. I argue that the debate between Ross and his chosen interlocutors (Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim and Lucien Levy-Bruhl) shows striking similarities with parallel debates in contemporary moral philosophy.

Similar books and articles

Herbert Spencer and social theory.John Offer - 2010 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Ross on desert and punishment.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):231–244.
Lettre inédite d'Emile Durkheim à Lucien Lévy-Bruhl.E. Durkheim - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:163 - 164.
The Data of Ethics.Herbert Spencer - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Right and the Good. Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake.
Ross's Prima Facie Duty.Fang Tianyi - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (11):988-996.
Herbert Spencer.William Sweet - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-22

Downloads
649 (#26,682)

6 months
104 (#42,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hallvard Lillehammer
Birkbeck College, University Of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ethics and Intuitions.Peter Singer - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):331-352.
The realm of reason.Christopher Peacocke - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience.Selim Berker - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):293-329.

View all 23 references / Add more references