The evolutionary mismatch hypothesis: Implications for psychological science

Current Directions in Psychological Science 27 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human psychological mechanisms are adaptations that evolved to process environmental inputs, turning them into behavioral outputs that, on average, increase survival or reproductive prospects. Modern contexts, however, differ vastly from the environments that existed as human psychological mechanisms evolved. Many inputs now differ in quantity and intensity or no longer have the same fitness associations, thereby leading many mechanisms to produce maladaptive output. We present the precepts of this evolutionary mismatch process, highlight areas of mismatch, and consider implications for psychological science and policy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A teleofunctional account of evolutionary mismatch.Nathan Cofnas - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (4):507-525.
Is contemporary grandparental care an evolutionary mismatch?Harald A. Euler - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (1):21-22.
Biology is destiny only if we ignore it.Jerome Barkow - 2003 - World Futures 59 (3 & 4):173 – 188.
Doing science, writing science.Jutta Schickore - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (3):323-343.
The basic components of the human mind were not solidified during the Pleistocene epoch.Stephen M. Downes - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 243–252.
How (not) to bring psychology and biology together.Mark Fedyk - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):949-967.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-10

Downloads
33 (#487,487)

6 months
12 (#220,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?