Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):37-48 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Narrative analysis is well established as a means of examining the subjective experience of those who suffer chronic illness and cancer. In a study of perceptions of the outcomes of treatment of cancer of the colon, we have been struck by the consistency with which patients record three particular observations of their subjective experience: the immediate impact of the cancer diagnosis and a persisting identification as a cancer patient, regardless of the time since treatment and of the presence or absence of persistent or recurrent disease; a state of variable alienation from social familiars, expressed as an inability to communicate the nature of the experience of the illness, its diagnosis and treatment; and a persistent sense of boundedness, an awareness of limits to space, empowerment and available time. These subjectivities were experienced in varying degree by all patients in our study. Individual responses to these experiences were complex and variable. The experiences are best understood under the rubric of a category we call “liminality”. We believe that all cancer patients enter and experience liminality as a process which begins with the first manifestations of their malignancy. An initial acute phase of liminality is marked by disorientation, a sense of loss and of loss of control, and a sense of uncertainty. An adaptive, enduring phase of suspended liminality supervenes, in which each patient constructs and reconstructs meaning for their experience by means of narrative. This phase persists, probably for the rest of the cancer patient’s life. The experience of liminality is firmly grounded in the changing and experiencing body that houses both the disease and the self. Insights into the nature of the experience can be gained from the Existentialist philosophers and from the history of attitudes to death. Understanding liminality helps us to understand what it is that patients with cancer seek from the system to which they turn for help. Its explication should therefore be important for those who provide health care, those who educate health care workers and those concerned to study and use outcomes as administrative and policy making instruments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary: Being Their Worst Nightmare: On David Perusek's “Cancer, Culture, and Individual Experience”.Arthur W. Frank - 2012 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 40 (4):512-516.
Response—Liminality and the Mirage of Settlement.Claire Hooker & Ian Kerridge - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):55-60.
Cancer, Culture, and Individual Experience: Public Discourse and Personal Affliction.David Perusek - 2012 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 40 (4):476-506.
The Phenomenology of Illness.Havi Carel - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
30 (#535,608)

6 months
14 (#183,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The Absent Body.Drew Leder - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.
The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics.Arthur W. Frank - 1995 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine.Eric J. Cassell - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The History of Sexuality: The Care of the Self.Michel Foucault - 1978 - Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

View all 13 references / Add more references