- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A critique of the 'fetus as patient'
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):42 – 44 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Risk and the Pregnant Body.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong, Lisa H. Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann & Margaret Olivia Little - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (6):34-42.
The “Fetus as Patient”: A Critique.Stephen D. Brown - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):47-50.
Reframing the Framework: Toward Fair Inclusion of Pregnant Women as Participants in Research.Ruth R. Faden, Margaret Olivia Little & Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):50-52.
HIV and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Women and Healthcare Policy.Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Ruth R. Faden - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):41-43.
Intercourse and moral responsibility for the fetus.Holly M. Smith - 1983 - In William B. Bondesson, H. Tristram Englehardt, Stuart Spicker & Daniel H. Winship (eds.), Abortion and the Status of the Fetus. D. Reidel.
The Decision to Abort.Rebecca Hanrahan - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):25-41.
Ethnographic Insights Regarding the “Social Role” and “Moral Status” of the Fetus as “Patient”: Comparing Developed (United States & Sweden) and Developing (India) Countries.Catherine Myser - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):50-52.
Pregnancy and Clinical Research.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (6):3-3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#445,442)
6 months
6 (#528,006)
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#445,442)
6 months
6 (#528,006)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reviewing the womb.Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Dunja Begović, Margot R. Brazier & Alexandra Katherine Mullock - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):820-829.
Restrictions on Abortion, Social Justice and the Ethics of Research in Maternal-Fetal Therapy Trials.Mary Faith Marshall, Alaia Verite & Anne D. Lyerly - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (3):78-81.
What Lies Beneath the Framework: The Importance of Grounding Ethical Discussions of Maternal-Fetal Therapy.Ashish Premkumar & Jessica Fry - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (3):73-75.
‘Experimental pregnancy’ revisited.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2022 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 43 (4):253-266.
References found in this work
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Précis of M aking It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom & Robert B. Brandom - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):153.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo