Designing a Just Soda Tax

Economics and Philosophy:1-21 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Soda taxes are controversial. While proponents point to their potential health benefits and the public projects that could be funded with their revenue, critics argue that they are paternalistic and regressive. In this paper, we explore the prospects for designing a just soda tax, one that appropriately balances the often-competing ethical considerations of promoting social welfare, respecting people’s autonomy, and ensuring distributive fairness. We argue that policymakers have several paths forward for designing a just soda tax, but that the considerations relevant to ethical policy design are more complicated than is sometimes acknowledged.

Similar books and articles

Editor's Introduction.Neal Baer - 2016 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (4):445-447.
Evaluating the Legitimacy of Contemporary Legal Strategies for Obesity.Stephanie Morain - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (4):369-393.
In Defense of the Nanny State.Lisa Kearns - 2013 - Voices in Bioethics 2013.
Public Bioethics.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (2):170-184.
Flat Soda.Mark Engebretson - 1992 - Business Ethics: The Magazine of Corporate Responsibility 6 (6):14-14.
Flat Soda.Mark Engebretson - 1992 - Business Ethics 6 (6):14-14.
Normative and Non-normative Concepts: Paternalism and Libertarian Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2013 - In Daniel Strech, Irene Hirschberg & Georg Marckmann (eds.), Ethics in Public Health and Health Policy. Springer. pp. 27-46.
Liberalism and Public Health Ethics.Alex Rajczi - 2015 - Bioethics 30 (2):96-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-04

Downloads
300 (#68,900)

6 months
166 (#19,702)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas MacKay
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform.Tommie Shelby - 2016 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism.Sarah Conly - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references