Secularism and Freedom of Conscience

Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor provide a clearly reasoned, articulate account of the two main principles of secularism—equal respect, and freedom of conscience—and argue that in our religiously diverse, politically interconnected world, secularism, properly understood, may offer the only path to religious and philosophical freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sekularyzm polityczny a spór o przekonania sumienia.Damian Barnat - 2017 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 65 (4):293-323.
Secularism and Freedom of Conscience.Jude P. Dougherty - 2011 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (2):434-435.
Pluralisme et sécularisation : une critique de Charles Taylor.Didier Zúñiga - 2015 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 10 (2):65-88.
The Secular and Secularisms.José Casanova - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1049-1066.
The secular and secularisms.José Casanova - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1049-1066.
Locke and the Political Origins of Secularism.George Kateb - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1001-1034.
William Ames's Calvinist Ambiguity Over Freedom of Conscience.James Calvin Davis - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):333 - 355.
An Interpretation of Secularism.Salvatore Veca - 2009 - Rivista di Filosofia 100 (1):23-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-04

Downloads
30 (#535,945)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charles Taylor
McGill University
Jocelyn Maclure
McGill University

Citations of this work

Modern Moral Conscience.Tom O’Shea - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (4):582-600.
Making sense of the postsecular.Umut Parmaksız - 2018 - European Journal of Social Theory 21 (1):98-116.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references