Tort liability arising from the act of artificial intelligence techniques

Abstract

In this study, we stood on the basis of tort liability arising from the act of artificial intelligence techniques, and we dealt with the concept of artificial intelligence techniques as programmed systems for human behavior and behavior that are carried out through studies conducted on humans for the purpose of applying them to the device or machine. And these technologies are of different types according to their capabilities such as narrow or limited artificial intelligence, general, super or super, as well as artificial intelligence systems have various applications and the most common ones we touched upon in the scope of our research are robots, cars and self-driving planes. And due to the lack of legislative regulation of their own, which raises problems regarding the legal personality of these technologies, they are algorithms that are similar to humans in terms of thinking and behavior and differ in terms of human and biological characteristics, so these technologies cannot be included under natural and legal persons, and the difficulty of determining the person responsible for compensating the damage resulting from the work of these technologies, so reference is made to the general rules of civil tort liability, so the responsibility for the actions of these technologies is established on the basis of responsibility for the actions of things, and that the objective responsibility does not fit with artificial intelligence techniques because of the multiplicity of the chain of intervening in this field from the manufacturer to the programmer And the operator and the beneficiary, since after their manufacture or use, they are out of his control, whether he is a designer, programmer, owner or user, so it was searched for the establishment of tort liability on the basis of liability for defective products, and that this establishment is followed in France and the American judiciary, given that the actions of the rules are the special responsibility for The action of defective products on the damages of artificial intelligence technologies is more in line with the present time in order to bear the burden of responsibility for the damages of these technologies. E techniques for the designer or manufacturer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Liability for failing to rescue.TheodoreM Benditt - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (3):391 - 418.
Insanity as a Tort Defence.James Goudkamp - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (4):727-754.
Tort Liability Under Uncertainty.Ariel Porat & Alex Stein - 2001 - Oxford University Press UK.
Is There a Case for Strict Liability?Larry Alexander - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):531-538.
Mens Rea in tort law.Cane Peter - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):533-556.
Partial liability.Alex Kaiserman - 2017 - Legal Theory 23 (1):1-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
11 (#1,141,291)

6 months
8 (#367,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references