Classical Logic

San Diego: Cognella, Inc. (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peer Review Book Description - Maria Seykora (female, published age 28) Classical Logic will attempt to give a comprehensive and rigorous introduction and more advanced overview of the area of logic widely known as “classical logic,” as distinguished from modern-day “non-classical logic,” for undergraduate students in general. It will cover the topics of Informal Logic (including logical fallacies, deduction, induction, and abductive reasoning) and Formal Logic. (Because it aims to cover these two topics, the title may change to Informal and Classical Logic for the first edition.) Within the category of Formal Logic, it will cover Syllogistic or Categorical Logic and Symbolic Logic. Furthermore, within Symbolic Logic, it will cover Propositional Logic, Predicate Logic, and Modal Logic. The Formal Logic component is currently unfinished, and the Informal Logic component is somewhat unfinished. The unique selling proposition is “the first comprehensive Classical Logic textbook.” It seems that many textbooks for college students today, including Patrick J. Hurley’s, are loosely organized around Classical Logic and other various areas of logic, yet there is not a clear-cut, comprehensive summation of Classical Logic in textbook form. For instance, Hurley’s textbook does not have a section on Modal Logic, and does not address some fallacies such as Hypothesis Contrary to Fact, the Genetic Fallacy, Appeal to Nature, No True Scotsman Fallacy, Emotionally Loaded Language fallacies, etc. Stan Baronett’s Logic textbook also does not include discussions of Modal Logic or these additional fallacies and others like them, and Siu-Fan Lee’s textbook does not include Modal Logic either. Additionally, abductive reasoning, which involves making an inference to the best explanation, is important in real life, yet it seems absent from most logic textbooks.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classical Logic is not Uniquely Characterizable.Isabella McAllister - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):1345-1365.
Paraconsistent logic.Newton da Costa & Otávio Bueno - 2009 - In Susana Nuccetelli, Ofelia Schutte & Otávio Bueno (eds.), A Companion to Latin American Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 215–229.
Classical vs non-classical logics: the universality of classical logic.Dov M. Gabbay - 1993 - Saarbrücken, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik.
Classical negation can be expressed by one of its halves.J.-Y. Beziau - 1999 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 7 (2):145-151.
Logics.John E. Nolt - 1997 - Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Classical negation can be expressed by one of its halves.Jean-Yves Beziau - 1999 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 7 (2):145-151.
An Introduction to Logical Theory.Aladdin M. Yaqub - 2013 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Classical Chinese Logic.Jana S. Rošker - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-09

Downloads
202 (#100,017)

6 months
202 (#13,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maria Seykora
Rosemont College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Laws and symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
A counterexample to modus ponens.Vann McGee - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (9):462-471.
A concise introduction to logic.Patrick J. Hurley - 2000 - Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Edited by Lori Watson.

View all 12 references / Add more references