Heidegger and Latour on the Danger Hiding in Actuality

Human Studies 45 (1):47-63 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The question concerning technology, Heidegger explores actuality in terms of danger. In chapter 3.6 ‘Who has forgotten Being?’ of his We have never been modern, Latour typically ridicules Heidegger and rejects no less than his whole thinking path. I contend that this criticism stems from an inadequate interpretation of Heidegger. By reading the latter in a modern register, Latour turns Heidegger into a modern thinker. Leaving aside the matter of modern elements in Heidegger’s thoughts, these are certainly not the elements that Latour brings forth. Indeed, to understand the danger that hides in actuality, if any, we should turn to Heidegger and read Latour from there.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Latour's Heidegger.Jeff Kochan - 2010 - Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Aristotle and Heidegger.Nahum Brown - 2016 - Idealistic Studies 46 (2):199-214.
Actants and enframing: Heidegger and Latour on technology.Lynnette Khong - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):693-704.
In the Event of Words: Art, Technology, and Language in the Later Heidegger.William Park Vaughan - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lost in the World of Technology with and after Heidegger.Susanna Lindberg - 2015 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):213-232.
Aristotle, Heidegger, and the Megarians.Hikmet Unlu - 2020 - Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 64 (1):125-140.
The Implications of Consistency.Mary Bloodsworth - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3-4):15-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-06

Downloads
18 (#837,580)

6 months
10 (#277,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?