From Blind Spot to Crucial Concept: On the Role of Animal Welfare in Food System Changes towards Circular Agriculture

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 36 (3):1-16 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Agriculture in Western Europe has become efficient and productive but at a cost. The quality of biodiversity, soil, air, and water has been compromised. In the search for ways to ensure food security and meet the challenges of climate change, new production systems have been proposed. One of these is the transition to circular agriculture: closing the cycles of nutrients and other resources to minimise losses and end the impact on climate change. This development aims to address existing problems in food production but also raises questions about animal health and welfare. Although the role animals can play in this development is not ignored, the animal welfare dimension of circular agriculture seems to be overlooked. We argue that this is a problem both for the success of circular agriculture and for the animals involved. To substantiate this claim, we analyse the background to this lack of attention, which we find in (a) the way circular agriculture is conceptualised; (b) the institutional hurdles related to the legal, political and economic context; and (c) the concept of animal welfare, which requires further innovation. By analysing these aspects, we develop stepping stones for an animal-welfare inclusive concept of circular agriculture. These stepping stones include: recognising the animal as a participant with its own interests in the innovation towards circular agriculture; using a dynamic concept of animal welfare; a concept of circularity that provides space for social values, including animal welfare; and attention to institutional innovation by improving public engagement and building trust.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Farm Animal Welfare Issues are Framed in the Australian Media.Emily A. Buddle & Heather J. Bray - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (3):357-376.
Animal Welfare Considerations in Small Ruminant Breeding Specifications.Rodrigue El Balaa & Michel Marie - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):91-102.
Mike Appleby. What should we do about animal welfare?Lantz Miller - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (4):457-459.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.
Recent studies and issues in animal welfare.Anna L. Peterson - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):215-222.
Does The World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don’t?Mary K. Hendrickson, Harvey S. James & William D. Heffernan - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):311-328.
Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems.Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5):501-502.
Christian Meyer, animal welfare legislation in canada and germany: A comparison. [REVIEW]Hugh Lehman - 1998 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (2):151-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-22

Downloads
13 (#1,043,598)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franck Meijboom
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.

View all 11 references / Add more references