In Search of Present Time. Which Role Can It Play for Aristotle?

History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (2):253-274 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his theory of time Aristotle does not often mention the present time and nowhere gives a detailed account of it. Nonetheless, present time plays an important role in his conception. I primarily argue for the following claims: (1) According to Aristotle there is a perception of motion and there is a perception of time. These combined perceptions can neither occur in the past nor in the future nor in an indivisible now. Thus, there must be a present time. (2) Aristotle acknowledges the passage of time. This passage of time can only be understood as a passing present. And since an indivisible now cannot pass, the passage of time delivers a further argument for the basic assumption of a present time. – For the most part I simply follow Aristotle’s argument in Physics IV 10 and 11. In doing so, I distinguish present time and now in the introductory puzzles, investigate the passing present in the co-perception of change and time, discuss the relation between change and the passage of time as well as the relation between the passing present and the different nows.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Standard Music Notation Able to Picture Aristotle’s Time?Niko Strobach - 2024 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (2):303-320.
Are Kinetic and Temporal Continuities Real for Aristotle?Mark Sentesy - 2024 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (2):275-302.
Time of Change in Plato and Aristotle.Ondřej Krása - 2024 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (2):232-252.
Descartes, Doubt, and Dualism.Michael Wreen - 2005 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 8 (1):83-98.
Preface.Ludger Jansen & Petter Sandstad - 2020 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23 (2):289-290.
Aristotle’s Critique of Plato’s Theory of Innate Knowledge.David Bronstein - 2016 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 19 (1):126-139.
“No Change for Relatives”: The Strategy of Initial Presence.Charles Girard - 2023 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (1):54-78.
Preface.Lisa Benossi, Sven Bernecker & Jakob Ohlhorst - 2022 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 25 (1):1-2.
Anselm. A Very Short Introduction, written by Williams, T.Matteo Parente - 2023 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 26 (1):149-155.
Descartes: Ideas and the Mark of the Mental.Claudia Lorena García - 2000 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 3 (1):21-53.
How to Base Apodeictic Syllogistic on Essentialist Theory.Paul Thom - 1998 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 1 (1):171-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-24

Downloads
13 (#1,040,014)

6 months
13 (#198,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Mesch
University of Münster

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The river of time.J. J. C. Smart - 1949 - Mind 58 (232):483-494.
Aristotle’s Physics.W. D. Ross - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (43):352-354.
Aristotle's definition of motion.L. A. Kosman - 1969 - Phronesis 14 (1):40-62.
Change in Aristotle's Physics 3.Andreas Anagnostopoulos - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39:33-79.
Aristotle's now.Sarah Waterlow - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (135):104-128.

View all 9 references / Add more references