Characteristics of inexpressibleness for functional-semantic category

Liberal Arts in Russia 6 (2):174-181 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The characteristics of the meaning of inexpressible is given in the article. It is shown that in the Russian language semantics of inexpressible is represented as a binary functional-semantic category. It was determined that the nuances of semantics of inexpressible can be represented in the form of a gradational scale on which they are distributed within the opposition ‘complete inexpressibleness - complete expressibility‘. The components of the situation of inexpressibleness inherent the means of transference of the value of inexpressible are described. It is shown that the definition of the components of situation of inexpressible contribute to the modeling of the field of semantics of inexpressible: what the concept of inexpressible means, in which situations semantics of inexpressible manifests itself; for whom this situation arises, how it is solved, can it be solved; by what means of language, speech and other semiotic systems it is expressed. It is determined that the situation of inexpressible includes seven components: the subject of speech inexpressibleness; an action that is impossible to express the statement; inexpressibility result of the process; objectivity of the situation described; reasons of inexpressibleness; the object of this situation; spatial area of the situation of inexpressibleness. It is shown that the central part of the functional-semantic field model components number 2, 3 and 4. The private values of the field of semantics of inexpressible were described for the first time. The definition of gradation nuances of inexpressibleness considering the paradigmatic and syntagmatic aspects of the study of the semantics were carried out for the first time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of inexpressibleness of the speech object.M. Yu Mikhailova - 2016 - Liberal Arts in Russia 5 (5):532-538.
The great ‘something‘.M. Yu Mikhailova - 2016 - Liberal Arts in Russia 5 (4):376-384.
A Critique of Tractarian Semantics.Gary Watts Levvis - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Semantic Vector Models and Functional Models for Pregroup Grammars.Anne Preller & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):419-443.
Inexpressible truths and the allure of the knowledge argument.Benj Hellie - 2004 - In Yujin Nagasawa, Peter Ludlow & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), There's Something About Mary. MIT Press. pp. 333.
Semantic values in higher-order semantics.Stephan Krämer - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):709-724.
What is a Non-truth-functional Logic?João Marcos - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (2):215-240.
Inexpressible Ignorance.Shamik Dasgupta - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (4):441-480.
Semantics and syntax: parallels and connections.J. E. Miller - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy.George S. Cree & Ken McRae - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
Kearns' Illocutionary Logic and the Liar.Manuel Bremer - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):223-225.
Weak Negation in Inquisitive Semantics.Vít Punčochář - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (3):323-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-23

Downloads
4 (#1,627,781)

6 months
3 (#983,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references