Dog talk

Interaction Studies 24 (3):484-514 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Canid and human barks and growls were examined in videotapes of 24 humans (Homo sapiens) and 24 dogs (Canis familiaris) playing with familiar and unfamiliar cross-species play partners. Barks and growls were exhibited by 9 humans and 9 dogs. Dogs barked and (less often) growled most frequently when being frustrated by humans and/or engaged in competitive games, and less often when being chased or inviting chase, and being instigated or captured. Dogs never growled when playing with an unfamiliar human, and humans did so rarely when playing with an unfamiliar dog. Humans growled and (less often) barked most frequently when chasing and capturing the dog, less often when engaging in competitive games, being frustrated by the dog, and/or instigating the dog, and rarely when showing or throwing an object. Dog barks were most often requests for the human to make an object available to the dog. Dog growls were often pretend threats when competing for an object or being frustrated by the human’s actions. Human barks and growls were typically pretend threats, and were sometimes used to emphasize simultaneous behaviors. Human barks and growls allow humans to connect with their canid partner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Controlling the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly?: Influences of sex and familiarity on Americans’ talk to dogs during play.Robert W. Mitchell - 2004 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 5 (1):99-129.
Controlling the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly?Robert W. Mitchell - 2004 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 5 (1):99-129.
Why Do We Talk To Ourselves?Felicity Deamer - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (2):425-433.
Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?James Andow - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):523-531.
Ian Ramsey on Talk about God (Continued).Donald Evans - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (3):213 - 226.
Irrealism about Grounding.Naomi Thompson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:23-44.
Self-talk and Self-awareness: On the Nature of the Relation.Alain Morin - 1993 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 14 (3):223-234.
Thought and Talk in a Generous World.Alexander Sandgren - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.
Talk about talk about talk about art.Allan Shields - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (2):187-192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-16

Downloads
13 (#1,042,023)

6 months
13 (#201,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Controlling the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly?Robert W. Mitchell - 2004 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 5 (1):99-129.
Controlling the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly?: Influences of sex and familiarity on Americans’ talk to dogs during play.Robert W. Mitchell - 2004 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 5 (1):99-129.

Add more references