Neuroethics, Consciousness and Death: Where Objective Knowledge Meets Subjective Experience

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (4):259-261 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Laura Specker Sullivan (2022) makes a fairly compelling case for the value of the perspectives of Buddhist practitioners in neuroethics. In this study, Tibetan Buddhist monks have been asked, among other things, whether consciousness, in brain-injured patients in a minimally conscious state, entails a duty to preserve life. In our view, some of the participants’ responses could be used to inform the bioethical debate on death determination.

Similar books and articles

Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness.Pierre Keller - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Is subjective experience reducible?M. Bednarikova - 2003 - Filozofia 58 (7):494-503.
The unity of consciousness: subjects and objectivity.Elizabeth Schechter - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):671-692.
Objective Phenomenology.Andrew Y. Lee - 2024 - Erkenntnis 89 (3):1197–1216.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness (review). [REVIEW]Frederick Rauscher - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):285-287.
Representationalism, Scepticism and Phenomenal Realism.Manas Kumar Sahu - 2022 - Prometeica - Revista De Filosofía Y Ciencias 25:51-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-24

Downloads
163 (#118,683)

6 months
120 (#34,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alberto Molina-Pérez
Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA-CSIC)