Knowledge is not a Conceptual Kind

Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on the Arts and Humanities (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that knowledge is a natural kind found in the modules of a massively modular mind. As such, it is not a conceptual kind. The result is that knowledge must be studied empirically and not by appeal to a priori analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Knowledge’ as a natural kind term.Victor Kumar - 2014 - Synthese 191 (3):439-457.
Boghossian on empty natural kind concepts.Tom Stoneham - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):119-22.
Group knowledge analyzed.Raimo Tuomela - 2004 - Episteme 1 (2):109-127.
Intuitions, Externalism, and Conceptual Analysis.Jussi Haukioja - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):81-93.
Two Kinds of Self‐Knowledge.Matthew Boyle - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):133-164.
Practical knowledge of language.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):331-341.
Knowledge and Awareness.Clayton Littlejohn - 2015 - Analysis 75 (4):596-603.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-12

Downloads
2 (#1,808,280)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Murray Clarke
Concordia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references