Close encounters with scientific analogies of the third kind

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Arguments from non-causal analogy form a distinctive class of analogical arguments in science not recognized in authoritative classifications by, e.g., Hesse and Bartha. In this paper, I illustrate this novel class of scientific analogies by means of historical examples from physics, biology and economics, at the same time emphasizing their broader significance for contemporary debates in epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Cumulative Force of Analogies.David Botting - 2018 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (1):105-141.
Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.
Science as Structured Imagination.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2010 - Journal of Creative Behavior 44 (1):29-44.
A Framework for Critical Materialists.Robert Prentner - 2014 - Mind and Matter 12 (1):93-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-30

Downloads
20 (#771,402)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
The material theory of induction.John D. Norton - 2021 - Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.

View all 23 references / Add more references