The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: Review of Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film [Book Review]

American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-13 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: A Response to Diana Neiva.Murray Smith - 2019 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-6.
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film.Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.) - 2016 - New York: Routledge.
Thinking on Screen: Film as Philosophy.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2009 - Routledge.
Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides.Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics.
Realism in film (and other representations).Robert Hopkins - 2016 - In Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. Routledge.
Understanding Film Form.Thomas Wartenberg - 2006 - Film and Philosophy 10:163-171.
The Philosophy of Film and Film as Philosophy.Tom McClelland - 2011 - Cinema 2:11-35.
Fictional Indeterminacy, Imagined Seeing, and Cinematic Narration.Angela Curran - 2016 - In Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. Routledge. pp. 99-114.
Survey of a Field? On Philosophy and Film , edited by Cynthia A. Freeland and Thomas E. Wartenberg.Brian K. Aurand - 1998 - Film-Philosophy 2 (1).
Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. Nova Iorque, NY, Estados Unidos: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics. pp. 116-134.
Murray Smith. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Iris Vidmar - 2018 - Philosophy in Review 38 (3):123-125.
New takes in film-philosophy.Havi Carel & Greg Tuck (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Looking Backward.Thomas Wartenberg - 2004 - Film and Philosophy 8:138-141.
Analytic Philosophy and Film: On Film Theory and Philosophy , edited by Richard Allen and Murray Smith.Samuel Guttenplan - 1998 - Film-Philosophy 2 (1).
Philosophy through Film.Christopher Falzon - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-10

Downloads
674 (#25,321)

6 months
183 (#16,393)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diana Neiva
Universidade do Minho

Citations of this work

Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides.Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics.
Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. Nova Iorque, NY, Estados Unidos: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics. pp. 116-134.
The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: A Response to Diana Neiva.Murray Smith - 2019 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-6.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the cognitive triviality of art.Jerome Stolnitz - 1992 - British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (3):191-200.
Theses on cinema as philosophy.Paisley Livingston - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):11–18.
Beyond mere illustration: How films can be philosophy.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):19–32.
The Philosophical Limits of Film.Bruce Russell - 2000 - Film and Philosophy:163-167.
Philosophy screened: Experiencing the matrix.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2003 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 27 (1):139–152.

View all 6 references / Add more references