In defence of a dogma: Davidson, languages, and conceptual schemes

Ratio 17 (3):312–328 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I draw on Davidson's work to generate counter examples to his claim that since there are no untranslatable languages there are also no alternative conceptual schemes. I argue that Davidson's argument to that effect is based upon an equivocation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Relativist Challenge to Comparative Philosophy.Ewing Chinn - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):451-466.
Why conceptual schemes?Maria Baghramian - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):287–306.
Conceptual Schemes and Presuppositional Languages.Xinli Wang - 2007 reprint - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:119-124.
On Davidson's refutation of conceptual schemes and conceptual relativism.Xinli Wang - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):140-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#340,113)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Isaac (Yanni) Nevo
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Citations of this work

On Davidson's refutation of conceptual schemes and conceptual relativism.Xinli Wang - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):140-164.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references