Charitable Matching and Moral Credit

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (3):687-696 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When charitable matching occurs, both the person initially offering the matching donation and the person taking up the offer may well feel they have done something better than if they had donated on their own without matching. They may well feel they deserve some credit for the matched donation as well as their own. Can they both be right? Natural assumptions about charitable matching lead to puzzles that are challenging to resolve in a satisfactory way.

Similar books and articles

Charitable giving (Peter Singer).Pablo Stafforini - 2018 - Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
How Charitable Is the Charitable Contribution Deduction?Yoram Margalioth - 2017 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 18 (1):37-60.
Applying Moral Caution in the Face of Disagreement.Jonathan Matheson - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-18.
The Charitable Continuum.Eric Kades - 2021 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 22 (1):285-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-06

Downloads
184 (#107,896)

6 months
85 (#56,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Nolan
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causal Proportions and Moral Responsibility.Sara Bernstein - 2017 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 165-182.
Moral Responsibility is Not Proportionate to Causal Responsibility.Huzeyfe Demirtas - 2022 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):570-591.
Why Citizens Should Vote: A Causal Responsibility Approach.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):201-217.

Add more references