On Elliott Sober’s Challenge for Biological Design Theorists

Philosophia Christi 9 (2):443-457 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/pc20079236

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Elliott Sober's Independent Evidence Requirement for Design.William A. Dembski - unknown
Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer.John Beaudoin - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):432-442.
Where the Design Argument Goes Wrong: Auxiliary Assumptions and Unification.Maarten Boudry & Bert Leuridan - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (4):558-578.
Empiricism and Intelligent Design I: Three Empiricist Challenges.Sebastian Lutz - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):665-679.
Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern: An Eighteenth-Century Debate about Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology.Elliott Sober - 2007 - In Jessica Riskin (ed.), Genesis Redux: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Artificial Life. University of Chicago Press. pp. 131--62.
Review of From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy by Elliott Sober. [REVIEW]John Dupré - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):143-145.
Firing squads and fine-tuning: Sober on the design argument.Jonathan Weisberg - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
I_– _Elliott Sober.Elliott Sober - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):237-280.
Critical Notice of Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science by Elliott Sober, Cambridge University of Press, 2008.Ingo Brigandt - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):159-186.
What is wrong with intelligent design?Elliott Sober - 2007 - Quarterly Review of Biology 82 (1):3-8.
Hume and the argument for biological design.Graham Oppy - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):519-534.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. Routledge. pp. 25--53.
Against the monism of the moment: A reply to Elliott Sober.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):616-630.
Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science.Elliott Sober - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
27 (#592,811)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references